December 18, 2003
Stack languages
Ned writes recently about PostScript's stack-based language model (like Forth, too). I was fascinated by PostScript a long while back, when we had a LaserWriter in the Dublin office; it's a great little language, but "difficult". In a related vein, here's a sanitised version of a JavaScript stack calculator language I've been working on recently. This is deliberately not a real programming language; it's an extension for the configuration file syntax I talked about a while back. Funny how these things grow, huh? Anyway, the principles are simple enough to make readable code, and yet nicely powerful. The syntax will be familiar enough: @functions. Of course the Notes @function compute engine uses a full-scale parse tree these days, not just a teeny little stack. To be a proper language, what more would I need? Just @def. (Oh, and maybe some datatypes. Or just one). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vcard
archives: January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 see also: {groove: [ ray, matt, paresh, mike, jeff, john ], other: [ /* more blogroll to follow */ ] } The views expressed on this weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||