May 14, 2003
FOAF
I couldn't quite put my finger on my misgivings about FOAF, but then I read some of the LinkedIn coverage (among the in-crowd, natch). My issue is this: FOAF seems way too explicit. Is there a non-identifying FOAF vocabulary? For example, I'd love to build something which identified people only by hash-of-identifier. (Happens I have a really great dataset for that, running in Groove all day). A visual interactive network map would be really valuable, but just cannot identify by name any people you don't actually know, or shared spaces you don't belong to. Whereas, a hash-of-ID FOAF might allow mapping without identification. This would leave it to each person in the network to resolve their known values, so naming the people they actually know. Like LinkedIn, Friendster etc, you'd gain the nice socialness of having to politely request introductions via mutual acquaintances. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vcard
archives: January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 see also: {groove: [ ray, matt, paresh, mike, jeff, john ], other: [ /* more blogroll to follow */ ] } The views expressed on this weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||